Comments for Free and Open Discussion of Safe Withdrawal Rates http://swrtracker.wordpress.com Proving it does not take much to get the ball rolling Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:21:33 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Hello SWR-interested World! by swrtracker http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-16 swrtracker Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:21:33 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-16 Its True: care to elaborate? NoReally: under what conditions? Trader: what constitutes 'proper' day trading? Its True: care to elaborate?
NoReally: under what conditions?
Trader: what constitutes ‘proper’ day trading?

]]> Comment on Hello SWR-interested World! by Trader http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-15 Trader Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:06:35 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-15 You guys are way to conservative: with proper day trading 19.5% is doable. You guys are way to conservative: with proper day trading 19.5% is doable.

]]> Comment on Hello SWR-interested World! by NoReally http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-14 NoReally Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:59:40 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-14 True Fact: 16.4% SWR is just as safe. True Fact: 16.4% SWR is just as safe.

]]> Comment on Hello SWR-interested World! by ItsTrue http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-13 ItsTrue Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:57:55 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-13 Fact: A 12.4% SWR is the safest known. Fact: A 12.4% SWR is the safest known.

]]> Comment on Open invitation to Valuation Informed Investors: by swrtracker http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/06/02/open-invitation-to-valuation-informed-investors/#comment-12 swrtracker Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:39:32 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/06/02/open-invitation-to-valuation-informed-investors/#comment-12 Please do. Please do.

]]> Comment on Deleted or Edited post info by swrtracker http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/description-of-deleted-or-edited-posts/#comment-11 swrtracker Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:13:22 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/description-of-deleted-or-edited-posts/#comment-11 No edited or deleted posts since inception. No edited or deleted posts since inception.

]]> Comment on Open invitation to Valuation Informed Investors: by gettinglost http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/06/02/open-invitation-to-valuation-informed-investors/#comment-10 gettinglost Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:36:06 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/06/02/open-invitation-to-valuation-informed-investors/#comment-10 I will have to consult jwr's web site before I can answer that question. I will start with the new old short long freshly edited posts and move clockwise. Hope to return before the bat signal shines in the night sky. I will have to consult jwr’s web site before I can answer that question. I will start with the new old short long freshly edited posts and move clockwise. Hope to return before the bat signal shines in the night sky.

]]> Comment on Hello SWR-interested World! by swrtracker http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-9 swrtracker Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:52:57 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-9 he he he --- promise, I'll let you post whatever you like, and if the Green Meanies are rude, abusive, or personal, I'll yank the leash on 'em... but if the *facts* are what leave your views out of favor... well, can't help with that :*) Cheers! he he he — promise, I’ll let you post whatever you like, and if the Green Meanies are rude, abusive, or personal, I’ll yank the leash on ‘em… but if the *facts* are what leave your views out of favor… well, can’t help with that :*)

Cheers!

]]> Comment on Hello SWR-interested World! by anonymous http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-8 anonymous Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:21:12 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-8 i would give my honest opinion but i am afraid of what the defenders of conventional wisdom might do to me! better just to lurk than to be exposed to the snarling attack dogs. i would give my honest opinion but i am afraid of what the defenders of conventional wisdom might do to me! better just to lurk than to be exposed to the snarling attack dogs.

]]> Comment on About by swrtracker http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/about/#comment-7 swrtracker Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:10:54 +0000 #comment-7 Nice new theme being tried out.... Nice new theme being tried out….

]]> Comment on Hello SWR-interested World! by swrtracker http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-6 swrtracker Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:01:38 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-6 pinging … … please, come in <b>Rob Bennett</b>… … are you out there? … Would sure love for you to give an overview of your SWR thinking, the rationale behind your methods, and maybe some dialog as to what might be left to do to refine it… Over and out. The stage is yours. pinging …
…
please, come in Rob Bennett…
…
are you out there?
…
Would sure love for you to give an overview of your SWR thinking, the rationale behind your methods, and maybe some dialog as to what might be left to do to refine it…
Over and out.
The stage is yours.

]]> Comment on Hello SWR-interested World! by swrtracker http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-5 swrtracker Sat, 02 Jun 2007 02:42:57 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-5 Thanks for the reply. That seems to be the consensus, i.e.: http://diehards.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=35594#35594 but just wanted to provide a haven for anyone who might have strong views needing to be aired, but felt they were not getting a fair shake anywhere else. They do not appear to be breaking the doors down, though, do they? [laugh] Thanks for the reply. That seems to be the consensus, i.e.:

http://diehards.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=35594#35594

but just wanted to provide a haven for anyone who might have strong views needing to be aired, but felt they were not getting a fair shake anywhere else.

They do not appear to be breaking the doors down, though, do they? [laugh]

]]> Comment on Hello SWR-interested World! by HonestandInformed http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-4 HonestandInformed Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:45:37 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-4 The basic 4% rule is analytically valid. Of course it is not 100% safe niether is going to sleep tonight. It is a very good rule of thumb and a resonable starting place for most. The basic 4% rule is analytically valid. Of course it is not 100% safe niether is going to sleep tonight. It is a very good rule of thumb and a resonable starting place for most.

]]> Comment on Hello SWR-interested World! by swrtracker http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-3 swrtracker Thu, 31 May 2007 20:40:07 +0000 http://swrtracker.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-swr-interested-world/#comment-3 Is 4% 'safe'? Is it analytically invalid? (Note -- be prepared to see questions as to what 'analytically invalid' means, so that we can drive for an analytically valid process, if we are indeed off track.) If it is wrong, what is a better approach? Why? What are any issues with a 'better' approach? Is 4% ’safe’?

Is it analytically invalid? (Note — be prepared to see questions as to what ‘analytically invalid’ means, so that we can drive for an analytically valid process, if we are indeed off track.)

If it is wrong, what is a better approach? Why? What are any issues with a ‘better’ approach?

]]>